A letter from Dr. Jim Meehan to a colleague (pediatrician) slandering him on social media for understanding the Gold Standard of testing does NOT exist in Vaccine manufacturing. It doesn’t exist because they removed all liability from vaccine manufacturers in 1986-most people don’t know that.
It’s just like when they removed liability from all hospitals during this “pandemic…” People died because there was no one to be held accountable for injury or death and most just did bare-minimum, sloppy, and careless work. Once you connect the dots, you have every reason to fight the system. Our future generations depend on us right now.
Letter:
“Dear (name withheld), MD (a Tulsa, OK pediatrician):
Screenshots of derogatory statements that appear to have been authored by you were recently shared with me. I have reviewed the statements. Your facts are wrong, your arguments are fallacious, and your personal attacks are as unprofessional as they are defamatory.
Apparently you lack the ability to argue the facts so you instead resorted to personal attacks. You appear to be constructing a false narrative with false accusations and thinly veiled dispersions intended to attack and smear my character. Although I have my own copy of your comments, I strongly recommend you delete your defamatory statements from social media.
If this carelessness is any indication of your carelessness in reading the scientific literature, then I can see why we disagree on the issue of vaccine safety.
As I have with many pediatricians over the last 10 years, I’d love to discuss and publicly debate vaccine safety with you. In fact, I challenge you to a public debate on vaccine safety. I’m always interested to see if my next challenger is as indoctrinated and ignorant as were your previous colleagues.
I simply require that you provide me with the “gold-standard” science proving the safety of the vaccines you deliver, and from which you profit, supports your belief in vaccine safety. You will be required to provide me with the scientific references; “chapter and verse.”
And you won’t get away with providing me weak, retrospective observational studies. That detritus may have convinced you, but it will not convince me; nor should it convince any reasonable scientist or anyone that knows the relevance and importance of the hierarchy of medical evidence.
I’m a former editor of the medical journal, “Ocular Immunology and Inflammation.” Immunology and inflammation were the focus of my ophthalmology practice and remain a focus in my preventive medicine practice. I also know how to read and discern good science from bad. I’ve reviewed most, if not all, of the studies you believe support vaccines. To the untrained, they appear to represent a large body of evidence. However, to those that know better, they are a crap pile of weak, inadequate, biased, confounded, not infrequently corrupted by contrived research methodologies, and frequently, authored by individuals with serious conflicts of interest. I assure you that the science you believe supports the vaccines you provide is built on the foundation of weak retrospective observational studies.
Doctors that simply read title and abstract conclusions while blindly trusting what they are told by industry (pharma), agencies, and organizations with huge conflicts of interest (like the CDC) betray their oath and allow unnecessary harms to befall their patients.
Your pediatric colleagues have universally failed to defend their beliefs because they failed to realize how financial and confirmation biases had suppressed their skepticism, diligence, and discernment.
Your task is to provide the evidence that supports the safety of simultaneously administering multiple vaccines to infants and children. Provide the highest level research that counters my claim that vaccines cannot be considered “safe and effective” because the high-level science necessary to support that claim has never been conducted. In fact, I assert that the “safe and effective” claim is so egregiously unsupported by the scientific evidence as to constitute a fraudulent claim designed to deceive the public, deprive parents of informed consent, and allow pediatric practices and vaccine manufacturers to profit from vaccines.
To narrow the task down a bit for you, I want you to show me the best scientific study (or studies) that convinced you that simultaneously administering a battery of SIX VACCINES to 6 month old children and NINE VACCINES to 12 month old children (see list below) have ever been reliably validated for safety using the only “gold-standard” science capable of supporting such a claim: double-blinded, RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS USING INERT PLACEBOS.
Between 5 and 6 months, the CDC says children should receive SIX vaccines (actually, six injections of EIGHT vaccines):
- Diphtheria, tetanus, and whooping cough (pertussis) (DTaP) (3rd dose)
- Haemophilus influenzae type b disease (Hib) (3rd dose)
- Polio (IPV) (3rd dose)
- Pneumococcal disease (PCV13) (3rd dose)
- Rotavirus (RV) (3rd dose)
- Influenza (Flu) (every year)
Because I know you’ve had a six month old child die shortly after you administered the six vaccines above; and you harassed, bullied, and denied the physician mother’s claims that the vaccines killed her daughter, I suspect you must have science to share with me. I look forward to seeing what you used to justify your claims and behavior.
Also, between 12 and 23 months of age, the CDC says children should receive the following NINE vaccines (actually nine injections of ELEVEN vaccines):
- Chickenpox (Varicella) (1st dose)
- Diphtheria, tetanus, and whooping cough (pertussis) (DTaP) (4th dose)
- Haemophilus influenzae type b disease (Hib) (4th dose)
- Measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) (1st dose)
- Polio (IPV) (3rd dose)
- Pneumococcal disease (PCV13) (4th dose)
- Hepatitis A (HepA) (1st dose)
- Hepatitis B (HepB) (3rd dose between 6 months and 18 months)
- Influenza (Flu) (every year)
What I already know is that you won’t find the high-level science you need to support you beliefs in vaccine safety. I’ve demanded it from pediatricians like you for more than a decade. They, like you, always deflect, resort to personal attacks and other fallacious arguments.
I assure you that none of these vaccines, not individually, and certainly not in the combinations routinely delivered to children, have ever been adequately researched to a level of scientific certainty that would allow any reasonable scientist to confidently conclude that vaccines are safe. Those that believe that “vaccines are safe and effective” are relying on retrospective observational studies.
The high-level science required to demonstrate safety has never been conducted for vaccines. If you disagree, provide your evidence.
If we learn nothing from the history of scientific research, we must learn that no number of observational studies can replace randomized controlled trials.
The scientific research evidence supporting my opinions and conclusions are self evident. The vaccine injured children are all around us and their numbers are growing exponentially. All you need do is look. Instead, pediatricians like you simply chant your mantra, “vaccines are safe and effective” and deny the vaccine injuries, even when they are as egregious as the Tulsa physician that lost her child to the six month battery of vaccines you administered. I’m certain you know the case of which I speak.
Consider that in America, the most vaccinated population of children on the planet, also has the most neuro-developmentally disabled, sickest, most autoimmune disease suffering, and chronic disease ridden population of children on the planet. The alarming rate of increase in childhood chronic diseases, from 12.8% of children studied in 1994, to 26.6% in 2006, to 54% of children today. American children, the most vaccinated children in the world, are suffering from one or more of 21 chronic diseases, more than at any time in history. The decline in childhood health in America is evidence of the epidemic of vaccine injuries. Childhood health in America is an indictment of the U.S. vaccination schedule and the doctors that allow financial and confirmation bias to prevent them from doing the due diligence necessary to protect their patients.
What I will teach you is that you’ve either never bothered to perform a thorough investigation of both sides of this vaccine safety argument, or your financial bias and cognitive dissonance forced you to suppress the inconvenient truths you found. I can show you what you missed or denied. But, I warn you, once you see the facts and truth, your pediatric practice and life are going to become far more complicated and uncomfortable as you are forced to confront the harm your ignorance has caused.
Still, it is better you do the right thing. You are on the wrong side of history. I pray you wake up and join me in demanding better science.”
-Jim Meehan, MD
